next message
previous message

08 12 2000
Irina Aktuganova: re: (Translation from Russian)


Long before I started working together with women's and, in this respect, also with feminist organizations, I had the suspicion that the situation of women in the Russian society is not as obvious as it seems for classical feminism. Of course constructions exist (stereotypes, hierarchies and similar), but above all these constructions are in our head and maybe even in our own subconsciousness. It seems it was apostle Paul who said "Everything is pure for the pure." (chistoe ?) In our case we might interpret this sentence as the possibility to flee from the influence of constructions by not carrying them in ourselves. Children don't know until a specific age, what gender stereotypes and gender discrimination are. Together they are playing daughters and mothers or war, and while playing they adopt their functions by heart (po dushi) and not by order.
At the same time a girl receiving mass education of all aspects - from cultural to everyday -, a girl being educated by Russian literature, being raised by grandmothers and mothers, is a product for which a whole life would not be enough to squeeze the hurt slave out of oneself. When, after having done all the necessary body movements to free herself from social and inner family slavery, a Russian feminist finally will be alone with herself, she will find herself again at the same point as at the beginning of the way. But the purity of the situation (not of the object on which one can repress everything pathological) will become a new pedagogical condition for her. Being alone with her chimeras, she anew begins her lonely struggle with herself. But that is a spiritual practice, which one will not get for free. Actually, to sum up this chain of thoughts in a simple equation, a truely consequent feminism in Russia would be the spiritual female way. And, as any way our spirit is following, it is a way for the chosen.In this sense, anyway more being concerned with humanities than with the political and the social, there is not much sense to waste time on the fight for rights, even more so as they all - the rights - are settled in our Constitution for a long time. It would be of more sense to stick closer to the essence of the problem - somewhere in the field of cyber-feminism (although in Russia this word is incredibly idiotic).
Every woman (being a feminist or not) is above all unfree by herself. (This actually also is refering to men.) And the older you get, the more evident this will become for you. In our legislative power only 7% are women.
Guilty of this are not the men, but women themselves, who constitute a huge percentage of able electors - but they don't elect women.
Amongst the representatives of Petersburg's women's organisations, who in 1999 were coming to our club to learn cyberfeminism, there was not one who wholly understood the importance of such abilities, like working in the internet, knowing how to turn on a computer, and the knowledge of editors. By the slightest difficulty their eyes would blur, and they were asking whether they could come back with their husbands or sons the next day, as they in their female dullness anyway would never understand how to use a computer. But those who understood the usefulness of the new technologies, at once figured out that with the help of the internet one can submit a marriage advertisment and maybe marry a wealthy husband, or even better a husband from abroad, who would take care of all her problems from then on. Or one can emigrate to Canada and live on social welfare. Hell, what a feminism with such a psychology. Here we will have to work for another 200 years to change from a parasite in essence to at least a human being. I would assume that nobody is discriminating women because of their qualities, at least not in Russia. In Russia women traditionally are being ascribed the most breathtaking qualities as courage, manlyness, noblemindedness, self-sacrifying, wisdom, determination, avangardism etc. And in extreme situations - and it is always extreme here - they demonstrate these qualities if necessary. But they somehow suffer from this. They don't want to. It is hard for them. It suppresses them.
They try to evade it at the first occasion. Responsibility is hard; above all, responsibility. Let HIM be responsible. I can do everything, but HE shall be responsible.
And the question of responsibility is a religious one. Here we are approaching cyberfeminism (idiotic word), because cyberfeminism is asking philosophical and existential questions. And it is not cyber-, because cyberspace is inavoidable breaking into our lives, but because we bore this space a long time, before it became a fact and an attribute of our existence. It is cyber-, because already in the 80s some of us, who were tending to self-reflection, were feeling themselves as "multytask cyborgs" (i.O. english). As multitasking and self-teaching bio-robots, who were perceiving life very discreetly, and who at every point of their existence were absolutely rationally realizing a new "identity" (i.O. english). Actually, there are many reasons to put the word cyber in front of feminism and not just to connect it with the present moment.

At the moment cyberspace is just a medium. Although an influential one. And there is a lot of various information about women. In my opinion, this is not very interesting, although sometimes it is useful. In principle all these women's resources are not feminist at all, but social. And regarding all this, they don't have at all any relation to the subject of our conversation.

With great respect,
Irina Aktuganova.


next message
previous message

back to discussion list
home