"By "woman" I mean a fictional construct, a distillate from diverse but congruent discourses dominant in Western cultures (critical and scientific, literary or juridical discourses), which works as both their vanishing point and their specific condition of existence. An example might be helpful. Let's say that this book is about woman in the same manner as science fiction is about the future - a speculation on present social reality cast in a particular perspective whose vanishing point is "the future", be it "1984", "2001", or "a year ago tomorrow". From the present state of scientific theory and research, the science fiction writer extrapolates and projects the possibilities that, were they to be realized and concretizes into a social technology, would effect an alternate world; that future, then, being at once the vanishing point of the fictional construct and its specific, textual condition of existence, i.e. the world in which the fictional characters and events exist. Similarly here woman, the other-from-man (nature and Mother, site of sexuality and masculine desire, sign and object of men's social exchange) is the term that designates at once the vanishing point of our culture's fiction of itself and the condition of the discourses in which the fictions are represented. For there would be no myth without a princess to be wedded or a sorceress to be vanquished, no cinema without the attraction of the image to be looked at, no desire without an object, no kinship without incest, no science without nature, no society without sexual difference....
By women, on the other hand, I will mean the real historical beings who cannot as yet be defined outside of those discursive formations, but whose material existence is nonetheless certain, and the very condition of this book."

Teresa de Lauretis 1984, "Alice doesn't. Feminism, Semiotics, cinema", Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p.5
 

Teresa de Lauretis:
Bibliography
Displacing Hegemonic Discourses: Reflections on Feminist Theory in the 1980's
 
 
 

home